ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Classification of fall risk in Parkinson's disease using empirical mode decomposition and machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fall risk assessment in Parkinson's Disease (PD) is critical for preventing patient injuries; however, traditional clinical scales are often constrained by their semi-quantitative nature and time-consuming administration. This study aimed to develop and validate an analytical framework integrating Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and machine learning for the objective classification of fall risk in PD patients. Methods: Data from 32 PD patients under four standing conditions were analyzed, with fall risk labels defined based on a Mini-BESTest score cutoff of ≤21. Center of Pressure (COP) signals were first decomposed into Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) using EMD, from which multi-dimensional features were extracted. Subsequently, the Sequential Forward Floating Selection (SFFS) algorithm was employed to identify a core feature subset, and the performance of five classifiers-Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-was evaluated using Leave-One-Subject-Out Cross-Validation (LOSO-CV). Finally, a multi-trial probability aggregation strategy was introduced to assess subject-level risk. Results: Results indicated that the rigid surface eyes-closed (rs ec) condition yielded the optimal discriminatory capability. The SFFS algorithm identified a parsimonious 3-dimensional feature subset (COPap_IMF1_BinEntropy, COPml_IMF1_STD, COPap_IMF2_TotalPower), which enabled tree-based classifiers to exhibit superior performance. Notably, DT and RF achieved highly balanced sensitivity and specificity, reaching a maximum subject-level AUC of 0.96. Discussion: In conclusion, EMD-derived multi-scale features can precisely capture postural control deficits in PD, offering a promising technical solution for the future development of efficient and objective PD clinical monitoring tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.