Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938054›Full record

ArticleMotivation and emotion2026

Autonomy over authority: the role of autonomous motivation in law compliance.

Anna Tovmasyan, Daria Onitiu, Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, Netta Weinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Motivation and emotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna TovmasyanSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Daria OnitiuOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sandra WachterOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Brent MittelstadtOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Netta WeinsteinSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2200-6617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear of punishment and perceived legitimacy of power are often believed to be key drivers of compliance with the law. Three studies challenged this view through the lens of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which posits that motivation can reflect internal values alongside such external forces, and in doing so stretched SDT into an important domain in which societal principles may inadvertently undermine motivation. Participants evaluated a proposed healthcare data law, presented in a clinical context, that pitted data privacy against the goal of building inclusive AI systems. Autonomous motivation to follow the law was consistently associated with intended law compliance. Conversely, controlled motivation driven by expectations of consequences showed mixed (positive or absent) effects on intended compliance. These results emphasize that relying on the threat of punishment may be insufficient for ensuring law compliance. Laws must be written in a way that resonate with values held by the public.

Indexed as

HealthcareLawMotivationSDTValues

Identifiers

PMID41938054
PMCPMC13048937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.