ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Advancing physical literacy measurement in early childhood: psychometric properties of a novel assessment and profiling method and its relationship with physical activity.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Physical literacy provides a compelling framework for understanding young children's skills, attitudes, and behaviours in relation to movement and physical activity. Assessment represents a crucial step for establishing conceptual and practical relevance. However, there is limited evidence to support how this multidimensional construct can be meaningfully assessed in early childhood, constraining both research advancement and applied intervention. Methods: This mixed-methods study primarily aims to establish evidence for the Physical Literacy Early Years (PLEY) Wheel, a novel assessment approach assessing physical, social, cognitive, and affective skills and behaviours in children aged 3-5 years. 234 children (74% White British; age 3.84 ± 0.70 years; 51% girls, IMD decile 3.70 ± 3.0) and 17 educators (88% female) from 15 early education settings participated across a multi-phase study design. Secondary analyses examine associations with key variables, including device-based measured physical activity, and explore profile-based representations to support interpretation. Results: The PLEY Wheel provides a valid, reliable, and practical approach to benchmarking and profiling physical literacy in early childhood. The results showed that physical literacy increased with age, with girls scoring higher in cognitive and social domains, and children with special education needs or disabilities demonstrating lower physical literacy and physical activity. Physical activity varied widely within and between early education settings and was associated with physical literacy. Five profiles were identified, based on domain strengths and weaknesses, that were sensitive to age, sex, and socio-economic context, but did not strongly differentiate physical activity levels. Discussion: These findings advance the understanding of physical activity and physical literacy in 3-5-year-old children and highlight the potential of a child-centred, data-led approach. Establishing a valid and reliable assessment tool for early childhood provides a methodological foundation for examining how physical literacy manifests, relates to physical activity, and can be meaningfully interpreted to support early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.