Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938021›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

Advancing physical literacy measurement in early childhood: psychometric properties of a novel assessment and profiling method and its relationship with physical activity.

Natalie Weir, Richard Tyler, Andy Pringle, Clare M P Roscoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalie WeirClinical Exercise Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
Richard TylerSport, Physical Activity, Health, and Wellbeing Research Group, International Centre for Applied Research with Children, Young People, Pregnant Women and Families (iCARE), Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.
Andy PringleClinical Exercise Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
Clare M P RoscoeClinical Exercise Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Physical literacy provides a compelling framework for understanding young children's skills, attitudes, and behaviours in relation to movement and physical activity. Assessment represents a crucial step for establishing conceptual and practical relevance. However, there is limited evidence to support how this multidimensional construct can be meaningfully assessed in early childhood, constraining both research advancement and applied intervention. Methods: This mixed-methods study primarily aims to establish evidence for the Physical Literacy Early Years (PLEY) Wheel, a novel assessment approach assessing physical, social, cognitive, and affective skills and behaviours in children aged 3-5 years. 234 children (74% White British; age 3.84 ± 0.70 years; 51% girls, IMD decile 3.70 ± 3.0) and 17 educators (88% female) from 15 early education settings participated across a multi-phase study design. Secondary analyses examine associations with key variables, including device-based measured physical activity, and explore profile-based representations to support interpretation. Results: The PLEY Wheel provides a valid, reliable, and practical approach to benchmarking and profiling physical literacy in early childhood. The results showed that physical literacy increased with age, with girls scoring higher in cognitive and social domains, and children with special education needs or disabilities demonstrating lower physical literacy and physical activity. Physical activity varied widely within and between early education settings and was associated with physical literacy. Five profiles were identified, based on domain strengths and weaknesses, that were sensitive to age, sex, and socio-economic context, but did not strongly differentiate physical activity levels. Discussion: These findings advance the understanding of physical activity and physical literacy in 3-5-year-old children and highlight the potential of a child-centred, data-led approach. Establishing a valid and reliable assessment tool for early childhood provides a methodological foundation for examining how physical literacy manifests, relates to physical activity, and can be meaningfully interpreted to support early intervention.

Indexed as

assessmentearly yearseducationphysical activityphysical literacypre-schoolpsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID41938021
PMCPMC13044117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.