ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
Application of the best evidence for preventing central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) for the prevention and management of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and to evaluate its clinical effectiveness in enhancing nurses' knowledge and reducing CRT incidence rates. Methods: A systematic approach was employed to retrieve, screen, evaluate, and synthesize literature, identifying best evidence for CRT prevention and management in CRRT patients. From August 1, 2023 to February 29, 2024, the Ottawa Model of Clinical Application guided the development of audit criteria based on best evidence. Clinical audits were conducted to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence, refining the EBP content for CRRT patient CRT prevention and management. Subsequently, from March 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024, this EBP was implemented in the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the implementation rates of audit criteria, nurses' knowledge scores on CRRT patient CRT prevention and management, and patient CRT incidence rates before and after the EBP intervention. Results: A total of 51 nurses and 247 patients were enrolled in this study, with 123 patients assigned to the pre-EBP phase and 124 patients to the post-EBP phase. Compliance rates for all 16 established review indicators demonstrated a significant upward trend following EBP implementation; however, four key indicators failed to meet the 90 % compliance threshold: nurse-conducted risk factor assessment, ultrasound-guided venipuncture, X-ray imaging for catheter dysfunction, and administration of thrombolytic therapy. Nurses' knowledge regarding CRT prevention and management was significantly enhanced, with questionnaire scores increasing from (77.72 ± 4.96) to (87.02 ± 6.17) ( Conclusion: Evidence-based nursing practice tailored to prevent CRT in patients undergoing CRRT significantly enhances nurses' specialized knowledge in CRT prevention and management, effectively reduces the incidence of CRT, and further fortifies safeguards for patient safety by optimizing clinical nursing quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.