ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2026
ICU nurses' experiences with virtual reality technology for work-related stress reduction: A qualitative study.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scoping review of virtual reality technology utilization in patients with colorectal cancer.BMC nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore experiences of ICU nurses with a virtual reality (VR)-based stress reduction intervention and identify the factors influencing its acceptance, guided by the Technology Acceptance Model. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in the ICU of a tertiary hospital in China. Fifteen nurses who had completed a VR intervention were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews between September and October 2025. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Results: The analysis yielded five key themes. 1) Perceived usefulness: nurses recognized VR's effectiveness in reducing stress, primarily through mechanisms of immediate relaxation and psychological detachment from the high-pressure clinical environment. 2) Perceived ease of use: the adoption process was hindered not only by technical issues but, more fundamentally, by a persistent inability to disengage from patient care responsibilities during use mentally. 3) Influence of external variables: a critical barrier identified was the absence of structured organizational support, encompassing protected time, dedicated private spaces, and clear implementation policies. 4) Behavioral intention and usage patterns: despite existing barriers, participants expressed a conditional willingness to adopt VR, integrating it flexibly into their routines for in-shift respite or post-shift recovery. 5) Recommendations for improvement: practical suggestions for optimization focused on three areas, including diversifying VR content, improving hardware ergonomics, and establishing essential institutional enablers. Conclusions: VR technology has the potential to alleviate stress among ICU nurses. However, its sustainable integration into clinical practice requires a systemic approach that addresses multifaceted barriers, with organizational policy and support being the most critical enabling factor. Future initiatives must extend beyond technological optimization to include protected time, dedicated spaces, and supportive policies to ensure effectiveness and long-term adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.