Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937980›Full record

ArticleLaboratories2026

Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (OLA)-Simple: Field Implementation, Usability, and Performance of a near Point-of-Care HIV Drug Resistance Assay in Kenya.

Prestone O Owiti, Bhavna H Chohan, Ingrid A Beck, Nuttada Panpradist, Pooja Maheria, Katherine K Thomas, Jessica H Giang, Leonard Kingwara, Vera M Onwonga, Rukia S Madada and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratories, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Prestone O OwitiDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 19676-00202, Kenya.ORCID 0009-0008-1014-4530
Bhavna H ChohanDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2125-6799
Ingrid A BeckCenter for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Nuttada PanpradistDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-4110
Pooja MaheriaDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Katherine K ThomasDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Jessica H GiangSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-9609-1470
Leonard KingwaraNational Public Health Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 20750-00202, Kenya.
Vera M OnwongaNational Public Health Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 20750-00202, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-8351-7520
Rukia S MadadaNational Public Health Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 20750-00202, Kenya.
Shalyn AkasaNational Public Health Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 20750-00202, Kenya.
Grace AkinyiCenter for Global Health Research (CGHR), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu P.O. Box 1578-40100, Kenya.
Valarie OpolloCenter for Global Health Research (CGHR), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu P.O. Box 1578-40100, Kenya.
John KiiruNational Public Health Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 20750-00202, Kenya.
Nancy BowenNational Public Health Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 20750-00202, Kenya.
Mansour SamadpourIEH Laboratories & Consulting Group, Seattle, WA 98125, USA.
Garoma W BashaDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Barry R LutzDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4298-4901
Lisa M FrenkelDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9566-8959
Patrick OyaroHealth Innovations Kenya (HIK), Kisumu P.O. Box 2871-40100, Kenya.
Lisa L AbuogiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1492-5090
Rena C PatelDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9893-5856

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CONNIE L CELUM · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Achieving successful treatment outcomes among adolescents and pregnant/postpartum women living with HIV in KenyaK24AI175015 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Lisa Lynn Abuogi · 2023 to 2026
$762k
Optimizing viral load suppression in Kenyan children on antiretroviral therapy (Opt4Kids)R34MH115769 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ABUOGI, LISA LYNN, PATEL, RENA CHIMAN · 2018 to 2019
$698k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI175015NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH115769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A point-of-care (POC) HIV drug resistance (HIV-DR) test is needed for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (OLA)-Simple, designed as a near-POC HIV-DR test, was assessed for its overall usability in Kenya by technicians with and without molecular laboratory PCR experience. Further, its diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by PCR-experienced technicians utilizing 147 plasma samples with known Sanger sequence genotypes-based on seven major HIV-DR mutations of nucleotide and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Thirteen laboratory technicians were recruited, including five with prior PCR experience. Twelve technicians completed the training and attained OLA-Simple testing competency, ten of whom were able to perform the OLA-Simple test within 6 h. Technicians' survey feedback indicated the user-friendliness of OLA-Simple, citing straightforward reagent reconstitution, concise instructions in prompts, and a shorter sample-to-result test time compared to standard genotyping assays. Of the 147 archived plasma samples tested, 132 (90%) yielded interpretable results. OLA-Simple assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.3% (95% CI 94.5, 98.9), a specificity of 97.2% (95% CI 95.5, 98.3), and a percent agreement of 97.1% (95% CI 95.9, 98.2) compared to Sanger sequencing. This evaluation found that OLA-Simple was user-friendly among intended end-users and performed well. LMIC HIV programs would benefit from strategizing on case-use scenarios for such near-POC HIV-DR assays to improve HIV outcomes.

Indexed as

HIV drug mutationsLMICnear point-of-careresistance testinguser-friendly

Identifiers

PMID41937980
PMCPMC13046437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.