Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937979›Full record

ArticleThe British and Irish orthoptic journal2026

Impact of Different Illumination Levels on Ocular Parameters in Healthy Adults During Book-Reading: An Experimental Study.

Vishal Biswas, Roshni Majumder, Supriya Awasthi, Rahul Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British and Irish orthoptic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vishal BiswasDepartment of Optometry, School of Allied Health Sciences, Noida International University, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5076-8179
Roshni MajumderDepartment of Optometry, School of Allied Health Sciences, Noida International University, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0307-3104
Supriya AwasthiSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Noida International University, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9487-0573
Rahul SinghDepartment of Ophthalmology, Noida International Institute of Medical Sciences, Noida International University, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-9317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To determine the role of different levels of illumination on various binocular vision parameters. Settings and design: An experimental study was conducted from October 2024-June 2025. Methods: Thirty-four participants aged between 17 to 25 years with a mean age of 19.7 ± 2.4 years were included. Under different lighting conditions, i.e., low illumination (50 lux), medium illumination (100 lux), and high illumination (150 lux), the participants were instructed to perform reading tasks. The vergence and accommodative parameters for near were evaluated. Results: Observed changes in binocular vision parameters were associated with varying illumination levels. At 50 lux, the binocular accommodative facility (BAF) was 6.97 ± 0.86 cpm; at 150 lux, it was 10.55 ± 1.04 cpm. Higher illumination significantly enhanced vergence facility (VF), near point of accommodation (NPA), and near point of convergence (NPC). Brighter illumination enhanced both positive and negative fusional vergence (PFV and NFV) values, while MEM retinoscopy demonstrated decrease of accommodative lag. Conclusions: Binocular vision parameters were higher significantly with high illumination which can enhance visual performance. Proper lighting is essential for eye exams, digital device use, and workspace design.

Indexed as

AccommodationBinocular visionConvergenceRoom illumination

Identifiers

PMID41937979
PMCPMC13045790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.