Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937972›Full record

ReviewReproductive medicine and biology

Advancements in Spermatogenesis In Vitro: From Murine Success to Human Applications.

Maki Kamoshita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maki KamoshitaGraduate School of Veterinary Science Azabu University Sagamihara Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7853-5164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Male infertility due to spermatogenic failure remains a global challenge. While in vitro spermatogenesis (IVS) offers potential for fertility preservation, recapitulating the complex, species-specific testicular niche remains a formidable task. This review evaluates IVS progress and bottlenecks across rodents, primates, domestic animals, and humans. Methods: This review summarizes a comprehensive literature synthesis of IVS methodologies, including organ culture, microfluidics, 3D organoids, and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived systems. Particular focus was placed on the technical evolution from the foundational gas-liquid interface method to the development of bioengineering platforms. Main Findings: Murine IVS systems have successfully and consistently produced fertile offspring. Conversely, human and non-human primate models show meiotic arrest, with differentiation typically stagnating at pre-meiotic stages. Although domestic animal models have occasionally yielded haploid cells, efficiency remains low. Recent single-cell analyses suggest that disrupted somatic-germ cell communication is a key driver of these failures. Conclusion: Bridging the gap between rodent success and human application requires integrating developmental biology with precision engineering. Future efforts must focus on establishing rigorous epigenetic and functional validation to ensure the safety and efficacy of IVS for clinical reproductive medicine.

Indexed as

in vitro spermatogenesismale infertilitymicrofluidicsseminiferous tubuletesticular organoids

Identifiers

PMID41937972
PMCPMC13045498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.