ReviewReproductive medicine and biology
Advancements in Spermatogenesis In Vitro: From Murine Success to Human Applications.
Review in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Male infertility due to spermatogenic failure remains a global challenge. While in vitro spermatogenesis (IVS) offers potential for fertility preservation, recapitulating the complex, species-specific testicular niche remains a formidable task. This review evaluates IVS progress and bottlenecks across rodents, primates, domestic animals, and humans. Methods: This review summarizes a comprehensive literature synthesis of IVS methodologies, including organ culture, microfluidics, 3D organoids, and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived systems. Particular focus was placed on the technical evolution from the foundational gas-liquid interface method to the development of bioengineering platforms. Main Findings: Murine IVS systems have successfully and consistently produced fertile offspring. Conversely, human and non-human primate models show meiotic arrest, with differentiation typically stagnating at pre-meiotic stages. Although domestic animal models have occasionally yielded haploid cells, efficiency remains low. Recent single-cell analyses suggest that disrupted somatic-germ cell communication is a key driver of these failures. Conclusion: Bridging the gap between rodent success and human application requires integrating developmental biology with precision engineering. Future efforts must focus on establishing rigorous epigenetic and functional validation to ensure the safety and efficacy of IVS for clinical reproductive medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.