ArticleNeurology. Education2026
Education Research: Choosing Wisely: A Mixed-Methods Study of Career Choices of Students Completing Advanced Neurology Electives.
Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Specialty choice is a critical decision for medical students who are often torn between multiple specialties; their final choice affects the trajectory of their careers and their long-term well-being. Understanding the process of this decision is invaluable for mentors, particularly those advising students who indicate a substantial interest in a specialty by electing an upper-level rotation. Methods: We surveyed 120 students who completed an elective neurology subinternship (Sub-I) between 2013 and 2024 about how they decided among specialties. We asked these graduates to provide narrative descriptions of their decision-making process and advice for current students deciding between specialties. We analyzed quantitative data using chi-square tests and qualitative data by content analysis. Results: Fifty-nine of 120 graduates responded (49% response rate). Thirty (51%) are currently practicing neurology and 29 (49%) are practicing another specialty. Sixty-four percent changed their premedical school specialty preference during school ( Discussion: This study demonstrates that high-quality subinternships and strong mentorship play essential roles in guiding undecided medical students. Clinical experience, culture and lifestyle of the specialty, and intellectual curiosity are key factors which shape this decision. These insights can help mentors, especially those advising neurology subinterns, provide targeted guidance, supporting students in choosing a specialty that is both personally fulfilling and intellectually rewarding.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.