ArticlePediatric health, medicine and therapeutics2026
Nurses and Midwives Mistakes and Errors in Pediatric Health Outcomes in Southwestern Uganda.
Article in Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Predictors of Severe Perineal Tears Following Episiotomy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Uganda.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: According to the World Health Organization, nearly 1 in 10 patients suffer harm during healthcare, resulting in over 3 million deaths in low- and middle-income countries. Alarmingly, more than half of these incidents are preventable, with medication errors being the primary cause. Children are particularly vulnerable to these errors and other adverse patient events. Therefore, this study explored nurses and midwives' mistakes and errors in paediatric health outcomes in southwestern Uganda. Methods: We adopted a phenomenological qualitative research design. Purposive and consecutive sampling methods were used to recruit nurses and midwives who had served in their respective units for at least six months and were willing to participate and signed a written informed consent form. Data collection was done using a semi-structured interview guide. All interviews were face-to-face and audio-recorded upon participants' consent. Thematic analysis was used to generate the themes. Results: The study revealed four themes that emerged from participants' perceptions regarding the reasons for pediatric medication errors namely; work flow and work environment, work overload, limited resources and training and education need. Regarding participants' experience of pediatric medication errors, omission and commission errors was quoted and three themes emerged from interventions to medication errors, namely; sticking to rights of drug administration, education and training, and resources. Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that although nurses demonstrated positive perceptions of strategies to improve pediatric medication safety, medication errors remain a serious challenge requiring close supervision. The primary problem identified as quoted verbatim by the participants is "…overcrowding of babies in limited clinical spaces", which created a high-risk environment for errors. The findings highlight the urgent need to incorporate the voices of nurses into policy, education, and training initiatives. Such inclusion will contribute to the development of robust healthcare systems and more effective strategies to enhance pediatric medication safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.