Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937881›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2026

Tumor size as a key determinant of treatment strategy and prognosis in stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary metastases: a retrospective study.

Kae Okuma, Tairo Kashihara, Koji Inaba, Kana Takahashi, Madoka Sakuramachi, Ayaka Nagao, Akane Yoshiba, Akikazu Kobori, Tongyu Gao, Shoki Nakamura and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kae OkumaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tairo KashiharaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji InabaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kana TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Madoka SakuramachiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayaka NagaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akane YoshibaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akikazu KoboriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tongyu GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoki NakamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi IgakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is widely used for pulmonary metastases, but the optimal dose-fractionation strategy remains uncertain. Tumor size may critically influence both treatment selection and prognosis. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 173 metastatic lung lesions in 152 patients treated with SBRT between February 2018 and August 2023. Tumor characteristics, dose-fractionation schedules, and outcomes were assessed. Associations between tumor size, treatment choice, and prognosis were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards models, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Median tumor size was 15 mm. Larger tumors more frequently received fractionated regimens such as 60 Gy in 10 fractions (p = 0.028). Tumor size was an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.041; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.001-1.083; p = 0.045)]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified 16.75 mm as the optimal OS cutoff [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.651], with tumors above this threshold showing significantly worse OS (p = 0.009). Local control (LC) did not significantly differ by size or regimen, although larger tumors showed a non-significant LC decline. Primary tumor histology was not associated with OS or LC. Grade ≥ 2 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 5.3% of cases. Conclusions: Tumor size is a decisive factor shaping both dose-fractionation and survival in SBRT for pulmonary metastases. Larger tumors tend to receive more fractionated, lower BED regimens, potentially compromising survival. Prospective trials incorporating tumor size-based stratification and BED optimization are warranted to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

biological effective dose (BED)dose-fractionationlocal controloverall survivalpulmonary metastasesstereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)tumor size

Identifiers

PMID41937881
PMCPMC13046411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.