ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2026
Concurrent systemic treatment during stereotactic radiosurgery for breast cancer brain metastasis - analysis of survival outcomes and propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has a fundamental role in the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Current data on the matter comes from trials with brain metastases from any histology or with limited description on survival, focusing mostly on response rate. This retrospective study will assess the impact of SRS on survival and its interaction with systemic treatment (ST). Materials and methods: Charts from January 2011 to July 2022 were retrospectively assessed to investigate the relation between SRS and concurrent ST for BCBM. Since different protocols for ST can be offered, we divided our cohort and assessed the impact of different concurrent ST, in each subtype, on oncological survival outcomes. Results: There were 208 patients, 138 met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 10.7 months. Median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), survival-free from central nervous system (CNS) progression and survival-free from new neurological deficits were 12.5, 14.1, 16.2, and 16.3 months, respectively. For the whole cohort, any concurrent ST did not impact OS (p = 0.68). For hormone-positive patients, concurrent hormone therapy (HT) did not impact OS (p = 0.75). For those receiving anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-type 2 (anti-HER-2) therapy there was no impact on OS (p = 0.47). Propensity score match analysis found that ST during SRS would reduce the chance of death by 19.4%. ST did not impact toxicities, chances of radionecrosis nor survival free of neurological symptoms. Conclusions: There has been an increase in research on the synergy between SRS and ST. In our study, this synergy was not sensible for oncological outcomes. New prospective research should focus more on survival outcomes than response rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.