Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937843›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The impact of the mathematical adversity quotient on preparatory students' mathematics learning engagement: moderated mediation effect analysis.

Juanjuan Liu, Yu Sun, Yatao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juanjuan LiuFaculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China.
Yu SunFaculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China.
Yatao LiFaculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated how preparatory students' engagement in mathematics emerges from the interplay between internal resources, emotional states, and the classroom context. A sample of 484 preparatory students completed the Mathematical Adversity Quotient Scale, Math Anxiety Scale, Teacher Support Scale, and Mathematics Learning Engagement Scale. Using PROCESS (Model 4 and Model 15), we tested a moderated mediation framework in which math anxiety mediates the effect of the Mathematical Adversity Quotient (MAQ) on engagement, and teacher support moderates the MAQ → mathematics learning engagement and math anxiety → mathematics learning engagement paths. The results indicated that MAQ positively predicted mathematics engagement both directly and indirectly via reduced math anxiety. Teacher support exhibited a double-edged moderating role: it amplified the positive association between MAQ and engagement, yet intensified the negative association between math anxiety and engagement at higher levels of support. These findings refine the person-environment framework of learning engagement by demonstrating that teacher support can simultaneously amplify the positive influence of internal coping resources while intensifying the negative impact of math anxiety on engagement. Practically, preparatory mathematics programs should focus on developing students' MAQ, shift from universal to diagnostic support that prioritizes psychological safety for highly anxious students, and take advantage of the transitional nature of the preparatory stage by strengthening resilience alongside knowledge remediation.

Indexed as

math anxietymathematical adversity quotientmathematics learning engagementpreparatory studentsteacher support

Identifiers

PMID41937843
PMCPMC13043430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.