ArticleJAMIA open2026
Development and evaluation of machine learning models for the detection of emergency department patients with opioid misuse from clinical notes.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models to detect opioid misuse in emergency department patients at triage.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Opioid Safety Surveillance from Clinical Text: A Clinically Focused Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning models to detect opioid misuse in Emergency Department patients at triage.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The accurate identification of Emergency Department (ED) encounters involving opioid misuse is critical for health services, research, and surveillance. We sought to develop natural language processing (NLP)-based models for the detection of ED encounters involving opioid misuse. Methods: A sample of ED encounters enriched for opioid misuse was manually annotated and clinical notes extracted. We evaluated classic machine learning (ML) methods, fine-tuning of publicly available pretrained language models, and a previously developed convolutional neural network opioid classifier for use on hospitalized patients (SMART-AI). Performance was benchmarked to opioid-related ICD-10-CM codes. Both raw text and text transformed to the Unified Medical Language System were evaluated. Face validity was evaluated by term feature importance. Results: There were 1123 encounters used for training, validation, and testing. Of the classic ML methods, XGBoost had the highest AU_PRC 0.9358 (95% CI 0.8945, 0.9681), accuracy 0.8874 (0.8402, 0.9349), and F1 score 0.8624 (0.7969, 0.9197) which performed comparably to ICD-10-CM codes [accuracy 0.8687 (0.8155, 0.9167); F1 0.8296 (0.7544, 0.8939)]. Excluding XGBoost, fine-tuned pre-trained language models generally outperformed classic ML methods. The best performing model by point estimate was the fine-tuned SMART-AI based model with domain adaptation [AU_PRC 0.9474 (0.9113, 0.9749); accuracy 0.8816 (0.8284, 0.9290); F1 0.8499 (0.7805, 0.9103)] but confidence intervals overlapped with other models. Explainability analyses showed the most predictive terms were "heroin," "opioids," "alcoholic intoxication, chronic," "cocaine," "opiates," and "suboxone." Conclusions: NLP-based models perform comparably to entry of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for the detection of ED encounters with opioid misuse. Fine tuning with domain adaptation for pre-trained language models resulted in improved performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.