Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937806›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

Development and evaluation of machine learning models for the detection of emergency department patients with opioid misuse from clinical notes.

Usman Shahid, Natalie Parde, Dale L Smith, Grayson Dickinson, Joseph Bianco, Dillon Thorpe, Madhav Hota, Majid Afshar, Niranjan S Karnik, Neeraj Chhabra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Usman ShahidAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Natalie PardeAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Dale L SmithAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Grayson DickinsonCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, William Carey University, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.
Joseph BiancoUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Dillon ThorpeAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Madhav HotaUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Majid AfsharDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Niranjan S KarnikAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Neeraj ChhabraAI.Health4All Center for Health Equity using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-1233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The accurate identification of Emergency Department (ED) encounters involving opioid misuse is critical for health services, research, and surveillance. We sought to develop natural language processing (NLP)-based models for the detection of ED encounters involving opioid misuse. Methods: A sample of ED encounters enriched for opioid misuse was manually annotated and clinical notes extracted. We evaluated classic machine learning (ML) methods, fine-tuning of publicly available pretrained language models, and a previously developed convolutional neural network opioid classifier for use on hospitalized patients (SMART-AI). Performance was benchmarked to opioid-related ICD-10-CM codes. Both raw text and text transformed to the Unified Medical Language System were evaluated. Face validity was evaluated by term feature importance. Results: There were 1123 encounters used for training, validation, and testing. Of the classic ML methods, XGBoost had the highest AU_PRC 0.9358 (95% CI 0.8945, 0.9681), accuracy 0.8874 (0.8402, 0.9349), and F1 score 0.8624 (0.7969, 0.9197) which performed comparably to ICD-10-CM codes [accuracy 0.8687 (0.8155, 0.9167); F1 0.8296 (0.7544, 0.8939)]. Excluding XGBoost, fine-tuned pre-trained language models generally outperformed classic ML methods. The best performing model by point estimate was the fine-tuned SMART-AI based model with domain adaptation [AU_PRC 0.9474 (0.9113, 0.9749); accuracy 0.8816 (0.8284, 0.9290); F1 0.8499 (0.7805, 0.9103)] but confidence intervals overlapped with other models. Explainability analyses showed the most predictive terms were "heroin," "opioids," "alcoholic intoxication, chronic," "cocaine," "opiates," and "suboxone." Conclusions: NLP-based models perform comparably to entry of ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for the detection of ED encounters with opioid misuse. Fine tuning with domain adaptation for pre-trained language models resulted in improved performance.

Indexed as

emergency medicineMachine learningnatural language processingopioid misuseopioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID41937806
PMCPMC13049196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.