ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
The mango core quality non-destructive testing and comprehensive harvesting decision-making model based on portable near-infrared spectroscopy technology.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is of great significance to detect the degree of mango maturity accurately and quickly in terms of timely harvesting according to market needs and building a differentiated post-harvest field sorting system. In this study, three main mango varieties-'Tainong', 'Guifei', and 'Jinhuang'-that originated in Hainan, China, were used as subjects. An H-100F portable near-infrared spectrometer was used to collect the absorption spectra between 650- and 950-nm wavelengths at 20 days before as well as 20 days after the commercial harvesting time. Four types of quality indicators, including fruit firmness, pH value, soluble solid content (SSC), and dry matter content (DMC), were measured in the laboratory to finally establish the non-destructive detection (NDT) and comprehensive harvesting decision-making model. As the results indicated, in the range of 650-950 nm, the average value of the spectrum absorbance for the three mango varieties decreased as the grade of maturity increased. The value change correlated significantly with fruit firmness, pH, SSC, and DMC (%). The Kennard-Stone algorithm method was used to divide the four quality indicators into correction sets and prediction sets. The original spectrum and the spectrum preprocessed using six methods, including multiplicative scatter correction, standard normal variate transform, Savitzky-Golay convolution smoothing, Savitzky-Golay convolution derivative, vector normalization, and maximum-minimum normalization, were then preferably selected to build a processing model for the four quality indicators of the three mango varieties. The test results showed that for all three mango varieties, both the revised standard error of mean squared root and the indicated standard error of mean squared root of the four quality indicators were less than 1.42, 0.62, 0.78, and 1.4, and 1.52, 0.38, 0.94, and 1.5, respectively. The accuracy rates of the model to test the grade of maturity for 'Tainong', 'Guifei', and 'Jinhuang' were 83%, 90%, and 81%, respectively. The above results indicated that the mango NDT model that was established on the portable near-infrared spectroscopy technology can reliably detect the fruit firmness, pH, SSC, and DMC of mangoes and can distinguish the grade of maturity for different mango varieties. The research results are of great significance to the decision-making of mango harvesting and the differentiated field sorting thereafter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.