ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026
A review of remote sensing-based crop yield estimation: machine learning techniques and environmental, algorithmic, and hardware limitations.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-source remote sensing and machine learning framework for maize mapping and yield estimation in fragmented Loess gully regions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- LCWG-DETR: a wavelet-enhanced detection transformer for citrus disease detection improving visual perception in harvesting.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in agricultural technologies have increasingly emphasized technical innovations aimed at improving the predictability and reliability of agricultural outputs. These aspects encompass developments in agricultural machinery, automation technologies, biotechnology, and controlled environment farming systems. This article focuses on Remote Sensing (RS)-based approaches applied to agricultural yield estimation for both crops and plants. RS technologies offer enhanced precision and scalability, making them particularly effective for large-scale agricultural monitoring and analysis. A systematic classification of RS-based methodologies employed for crop yield estimation is presented in this study. These methodologies are categorized into: (i) Sensor-Based approaches, (ii) Platform-Based approaches, (iii) Analytical and Modeling-based methods, and (iv) Machine Learning (ML)-driven models. Based on findings reported across multiple studies, it is observed that Deep Learning (DL)-based architectures consistently achieve superior performance across key evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. This performance advantage stems from their capacity to learn hierarchical representations, capture complex non-linear relationships, scale efficiently with large datasets, and reduce reliance on manual feature engineering. Following this classification, our article presents a comprehensive discussion of the limitations associated with these methodologies. These challenges are organized into four major categories: (i) Environmental, (ii) Algorithmic, (iii) Hardware and Operational, and (iv) Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) related limitations. The adopted classification framework helps readers identify and address the key challenges associated with effective yield estimation in crops and plants. Moreover, the article concludes by outlining several future research directions intended to support and guide both early-career and experienced researchers in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.