Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937763›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

A review of remote sensing-based crop yield estimation: machine learning techniques and environmental, algorithmic, and hardware limitations.

Aman Muhammad, Abdul Sattar Mashori, Mansoor Jan, Ziqi Han, Fuzhong Li, Sanaullah Jan, Syed Aziz Shah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aman MuhammadCollege of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China.
Abdul Sattar MashoriCollege of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China.
Mansoor JanDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ziqi HanSchool of Software, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China.
Fuzhong LiSchool of Software, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China.
Sanaullah JanSchool of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Syed Aziz ShahCentre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in agricultural technologies have increasingly emphasized technical innovations aimed at improving the predictability and reliability of agricultural outputs. These aspects encompass developments in agricultural machinery, automation technologies, biotechnology, and controlled environment farming systems. This article focuses on Remote Sensing (RS)-based approaches applied to agricultural yield estimation for both crops and plants. RS technologies offer enhanced precision and scalability, making them particularly effective for large-scale agricultural monitoring and analysis. A systematic classification of RS-based methodologies employed for crop yield estimation is presented in this study. These methodologies are categorized into: (i) Sensor-Based approaches, (ii) Platform-Based approaches, (iii) Analytical and Modeling-based methods, and (iv) Machine Learning (ML)-driven models. Based on findings reported across multiple studies, it is observed that Deep Learning (DL)-based architectures consistently achieve superior performance across key evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. This performance advantage stems from their capacity to learn hierarchical representations, capture complex non-linear relationships, scale efficiently with large datasets, and reduce reliance on manual feature engineering. Following this classification, our article presents a comprehensive discussion of the limitations associated with these methodologies. These challenges are organized into four major categories: (i) Environmental, (ii) Algorithmic, (iii) Hardware and Operational, and (iv) Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) related limitations. The adopted classification framework helps readers identify and address the key challenges associated with effective yield estimation in crops and plants. Moreover, the article concludes by outlining several future research directions intended to support and guide both early-career and experienced researchers in this domain.

Indexed as

crop productivity prediction and assessmentlimitations in yield estimationmachine learning based yield estimationremote sensingwireless sensor networks based agriculture

Identifiers

PMID41937763
PMCPMC13044055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.