ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Hyperspectral differentiation of three grapevine yellows diseases and symptomatically similar stresses.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The study aims to develop a method for detecting and discriminating grapevine yellows (GY) diseases, including Flavescence dorée (FD), Bois noir (BN), and Palatinate grapevine yellows (PGY), using hyperspectral imaging (HSI). Specifically, it seeks to address the challenge of symptom misclassification among visually similar diseases, such as distinguishing between GY diseases and other biotic and abiotic stresses. Methods: Hyperspectral images of detached leaves from field with GY diseases, Grapevine Leafroll-associated Virus (V), leafhopper (LH) infestation, iron deficiency (Fe), or magnesium deficiency (Mg) were acquired using a mobile platform in the laboratory or in the field. The images were taken in the spectral range of 400-1,000 nm. Classification models were trained on the mean spectra of the leaves to distinguish between different classes. Results: The model achieved F1-scores ranging from 54.2% to 96.8% for white cultivars and exceeded 95% for all six classes for black cultivars. When limited to GY classes and nonsymptomatic leaves, the F1-scores were 89.8%, 78.7%, 63.4%, and 53.4% for nonsymptomatic, FD, PGY, and BN, respectively. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the feasibilityof using HSI to detect and discriminate different biotic and abiotic stresses on grapevine leaves, including distinguishing between symptom-similar GY diseases. The developed mobile platform and classification models show promise for largescale monitoring and diagnosis of GY diseases, potentially improving disease management and reducing the risk of symptom misclassification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.