ArticleAustralian dental journal2026
The Australian and New Zealand Dental Implant Registry: Regulatory Requirements and Registry Development.
Article in Australian dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Therapeutic Goods Administration is responsible for the Regulation of manufacture and supply of all medical devices including dental implants. Medically, the patient is given a 'Patient Implant Card' (PIC). It is recommended to monitor the performance of devices in an implant registry.
methodsThe TGA Regulations were reviewed. The detailed methodology to establish a National Dental Implant Registry is presented and initial analysis performed.
resultsThe placement of dental implants in Australia is not as regulated as other comparable medical devices. Currently the Registry has 43 clinics with 44 participating dental practitioners. The DIR has recorded dental implant related information from 4842 patients with 9429 devices (Australian and New Zealand data). Patients were usually over 60 years of age, more female and more implants were placed in the maxilla. The Australian replacement rate of dental implants was 1.83% and 1.42% for prostheses.
conclusionsImproving the regulatory framework by introducing the issuing of Patient implant cards (PICs) so the specific device information type is transferable and retained long term and establishment of long-term independent monitoring in a Dental Implant Registry, crucial in identifying problems with the aim of improving outcomes for patients and dental professionals should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.