ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026
An Alternative Digital Workflow for 3D Virtual Patient Construction Integrating Intraoral, Facial, and CBCT Data for Esthetic and Occlusal Planning.
Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual patient construction integrates dental, facial, and skeletal datasets into a unified 3D model for prosthodontic diagnosis and planning. Despite advances, fully digital workflows remain limited by challenges in reproducibility and clinical validation.
objectiveTo describe an alternative digital workflow for 3D virtual patient construction integrating intraoral, facial, and CBCT data, and to demonstrate its clinical applicability through direct intraoral mock-up validation.
methodsA patient with esthetic concerns and mild functional asymmetry was documented using full-arch intraoral scans, facial scans, and CBCT. Craniofacial reference planes guided multimodal alignment using an Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm with predefined parameters. The integrated datasets were analyzed in a virtual articulator to simulate mandibular movements. A 3D-printed model and silicone index enabled intraoral mock-up validation.
resultsThe workflow achieved consistent multimodal alignment of hard- and soft-tissue structures, eliminating the need for analog facebow transfer or mechanical mounting. The intraoral mock-up reproduced the virtual design, confirming the clinical transferability of esthetic and functional parameters.
conclusionsThis workflow integrates virtual planning with clinical validation, thereby improving diagnostic precision, esthetic predictability, and interdisciplinary communication in prosthodontic rehabilitation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This approach provides a reproducible option for virtual patient construction, enabling immediate chairside validation and supporting more predictable clinical decision-making in esthetic and occlusal rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.