ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Development of a Patient and Carer Advisory Board to Co-Design Health Services Research for the Quality of Care of People With Dementia.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatient and Public Involvement (PPI) is becoming increasingly common in research and is now a requirement by many funding bodies. In this paper, we describe a PPI Board that was formed to bring lived experience expertise to the research conception, development and implementation of the evaluating quality care (eQC) project, which focussed on improving the care of older people and people living with dementia in acute care hospitals.
methodsWe discuss how the board was initially conceived and developed, including the process to recruit an appropriately skilled and experienced Chair and members, and operational aspects of the co-design focused Board.
resultsThe Board's membership, conduct of meetings and outcomes are described. The Board's eight members provided advice and input on research ideas and protocols. They co-authored 16 publications and provided advice and input on a further 12 publications for three PhD students linked with the project. DISCUSSION: Important aspects of PPI, including successes and challenges of setting up a PPI Board are discussed as well as recommendations for other groups who are interested in developing a PPI Board as co-design partners in research. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The eQC public and patient involvement board comprises people living with dementia and carers of people living with dementia. This article was conceived of and jointly planned with the eQC PPI Board and eQC research team. The research team members wrote the first draft (D.B. and P.P.), and the Board edited the manuscript. All Board members are listed as authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.