Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937415›Full record

ReviewNursing & health sciences2026

Advanced Competencies for Endoscopy Nurses: A Rapid Review of Current Practices and Training Approaches.

Andrea Minciullo, Daniela Tartaglini, Lucia Filomeno, Riccardo Grande, Dhurata Ivziku

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing & health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea MinciulloDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-2683
Daniela TartagliniDepartment of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-4217
Lucia FilomenoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9867-9319
Riccardo GrandeGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2554-6427
Dhurata IvzikuDepartment of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0091-7524

Funding

CECRI 3.25.2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As endoscopy procedures expand in scope and technology, endoscopy nurses find themselves requiring advanced competencies that span both technical skills and clinical knowledge. This review aims to identify the key advanced competencies for nurses in endoscopy, addressing competencies that optimize patient outcomes and the efficacy of endoscopic procedures. This review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Rapid Review guidance between June and September 2025 using MeSH terms including "endoscopy," "gastrointestinal endoscopy," "nurse," "nursing," "competence," "competency," "advanced practice," and "training." PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed articles and gray literature, with no language or time limitations. Sixteen articles were included. The core competency domains identified are: clinical assessment and patient management, procedural and interventional support competence, equipment management and infection control, sedation and patient monitoring, documentation and quality assurance. This rapid review provides an updated synthesis of advanced competencies in gastrointestinal endoscopy nursing. While core domains are recognized internationally, variation in training structures and role delineation persists. Findings contribute to the development of harmonized frameworks and inform future curriculum design and workforce planning.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEndoscopyHumansadvanced competenciesendoscopyliterature reviewnurse

Identifiers

PMID41937415
PMCPMC13051248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.