ReviewEuropean journal of neurology2026
Older Adults, Anti-Amyloid Therapy, and Frailty: What Oncology Can Teach Us.
Review in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Amyloid: Systemic and Brain Frailty as Determinants of Response to Anti-Amyloid Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease-A Conceptual Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnti-amyloid therapies, such as lecanemab or donanemab, represent the first disease-modifying treatments approved for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) in individuals with confirmed amyloid pathology. Their implementation in routine care raises important challenges, particularly in older adults with heterogeneous functional reserve and multimorbidity. We address the role of frailty in refining clinical decision-making for anti-amyloid therapies.
methodsThis short communication presents a conceptual discussion informed by geriatric oncology, where frailty assessment and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) are routinely used to individualize treatment in heterogeneous older populations. We describe how similar principles may be applied to anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies once regulatory eligibility has been established, and outline a frailty-informed conceptual framework to support clinical decision-making in routine care.
resultsThis conceptual analysis proposes a stepwise, frailty-informed clinical framework that integrates regulatory eligibility assessment with brief frailty screening and targeted comprehensive geriatric assessment. The framework defines differentiated clinical pathways for robust, pre-frail, and frail individuals, linking frailty status to specific decisions regarding treatment initiation, need for prehabilitation, intensity of monitoring, and consideration of treatment deferral. By embedding frailty assessment within routine clinical workflows, the framework operationalizes evaluation of physiological reserve, anticipates treatment burden and monitoring feasibility, and provides a structured approach to individualized risk-benefit appraisal for anti-amyloid therapies.
conclusionsFrailty-informed frameworks may offer a pragmatic and ethically grounded approach to support real-world implementation of anti-amyloid therapies, guiding treatment selection as well as longitudinal decisions on monitoring, continuation, and reassessment over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.