Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41937357›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Addressing Future Changes in Communication Using Hypothetical Scenarios With People With Primary Progressive Aphasia and Care Partners: A Conversation Analytic Study.

Winsnes Ingvild, Halvorsen Mia, Krogh Elise, Volkmer Anna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Winsnes IngvildDepartment of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7305-4620
Halvorsen MiaThe Faculty of Education and Arts, Nord University, Norway.
Krogh EliseThe Faculty of Education and Arts, Nord University, Norway.
Volkmer AnnaDivision of Psychology and Language Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4149-409X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) will experience a decline in language and cognitive function, and behavioural changes are not uncommon. Decline in everyday skills has been reported and becomes more pronounced over time. Previous research has shown that people with PPA and their care partners (CPs) want to address future changes. Addressing future changes and future planning is highlighted in guidelines, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) guidelines on Decision-making and mental capacity. The Better Conversations with PPA is a manualised program, where planning for future changes is addressed.

aimsThis study aimed to explore how the topic of planning for the future in Better Conversations with PPA is undertaken in conversations during the treatment sessions.

methodsConversation analysis (CA) is highlighted as the "gold standard" for analysing recorded healthcare communication. Using applied CA, a method to systematically study social interaction, we analysed video recordings from four dyads, comprising a person with PPA and a care partner, participating in the Better Conversations with PPA program. The sessions are led by a speech and language therapist. OUTCOME AND

resultsOur analysis shows that the structure of the conversations about the future is closely aligned with the structure of the Better Conversations with PPA program session plan. The speech and language therapist creates several opportunities for the dyads to engage in conversations about the future, using hypothetical questions and scenarios, creating a conversation environment where future changes can be addressed without the dyads having to relate this to themselves. Thereby orienting to the delicacy of the topic.

conclusionThe Better Conversations with PPA program provides a promising framework for addressing future changes. The use of hypotheticals seems to be a useful strategy to promote sensitive conversations about future changes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Primary progressive aphasia is a degenerative disease. Addressing future changes and future planning is highlighted in guidelines, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's guidelines on Decision-making and mental capacity. The Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia is a manualised program, where planning for future changes is addressed. However, less is known about how the topic is treated by people with primary progressive aphasia, care partners, and speech and language therapists. What this study adds to existing knowledge Using conversation analysis to explore the topic of future planning in the Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia program, we found that the structure of these conversations is closely aligned with the structure of the program. Hypothetical questions and scenarios seem to be particularly powerful in addressing future changes and planning for these. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The Better Conversations with Primary Progressive Aphasia might be used as a framework to address future planning. Hypotheticals seem to be a useful strategy.

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressiveCaregiversCommunicationAgedFemaleHumansLanguage TherapyMaleMiddle AgedSpeech Therapyadvance care planningconversation analysisdementiaprimary progressive aphasia

Identifiers

PMID41937357
PMCPMC13050999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.