ReviewPediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2026
Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity to biologicals in children-A practical approach: An EAACI task force report.
Review in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologics: Advances in Diagnosis and Management.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity to biologicals in children-A practical approach: An EAACI task force report.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, biologicals demonstrate how therapies can be personalized and directed against new targets. This type of therapy includes different molecules such as growth factors, immune modulators, vaccines, and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In recent years, biologicals have been increasingly developed and authorized, although their use in children is limited compared to that in adults, due to the complexity of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the involved proteins, as well as other factors, such as regulations governing clinical trials. Regardless, biologicals are used with efficacy in children to treat various diseases, including oncological, hematological, atopic, and rheumatological diseases. In parallel with the increased use of biologicals, there has been an increase in the unwanted effects of these agents. This paper aims to provide physicians with a practical approach to differentiate between the types of reactions to biologicals in children, especially mAbs, based on the frequency of use, for a comprehensive allergy workup. Starting from a clinical case (i.e., phenotype), specific biomarkers of the involved molecular mechanism (i.e., endotype) are described, providing the reader with currently known instruments to guide the diagnosis. Finally, practical limitations, preventive measures, and unmet needs were discussed by a panel of experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.