ArticleJournal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors2026
Longitudinal associations between 24-hour movement behaviours and cognitive function in adults aged 55 and above.
Article in Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAge-related cognitive decline poses challenges to healthy ageing. Physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and sleep have been linked to cognition, yet much evidence is cross-sectional and fails to account for the interdependent nature of these 24-h movement behaviours. This observational study applied a compositional approach to investigate longitudinal associations between 24-h movement behaviours and cognition in cognitively healthy adults.
methodsCommunity-dwelling adults aged ≥ 55 years were assessed at three time points, each one year apart (baseline n = 233; 51.1% women; mean age 68.3 ± 7.7 years). Each time, 7-day wrist-worn accelerometery data (ActiGraph wGT3X-BT) were acquired and processed with GGIR to derive time spent in PA, SB and sleep. Additionally, cognition was measured using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), yielding composite z‑scores for short‑term memory (STM), long‑term memory (LTM), executive function (EF) and processing speed (PS). Linear mixed-effects models tested longitudinal associations between time-varying time-use composition (i.e. 24-h movement behaviours expressed as isometric log-ratios) and cognition. Time was modelled as a categorical variable and models included an interaction between time-use composition and time. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and health covariates. Exploratory post‑hoc compositional isotemporal substitution analyses estimated cognitive differences associated with hypothetical time reallocations between behaviours at each time point.
resultsNo significant associations were observed between time-use composition and STM, LTM or PS. After adjusting for age, sex, educational level and living arrangement, EF was significantly associated with time-use composition (p = 0.005) and time (p < 0.001), with no significant interaction effect, suggesting a stable relationship over time. Exploratory post-hoc analyses suggested that moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) was the primary driver of the EF association. Descriptive reallocation patterns at each time point indicated that reallocating time towards MVPA (e.g. from light PA) was generally associated with higher EF scores, whereas reallocations away from MVPA were associated with lower EF scores.
conclusionsIn adults aged ≥ 55, 24‑h movement behaviours were associated with EF but not memory or PS, and these associations remained stable over time. Future research should examine longer follow-up periods, the (cognitive) context of behaviours and how changes in time-use composition relate to changes in cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.