ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Joint torque estimation from daily living motion for passive sarcopenia monitoring in older adults.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenia is a progressive condition in older adults associated with increased risks of falls, disability, hospitalization, and mortality. Despite its clinical relevance, early and accurate diagnosis remains limited due to reliance on indirect and subjective screening methods. This study introduces a passive, camera-based framework, Motion-AI Integrated Surveillance for the Elderly (MAISE), that seamlessly estimates joint torque from natural daily movements to provide a functional assessment of lower-limb muscle performance.
methodsThe framework utilizes a CoP (Center of Pressure) limiter to enforce biomechanical constraints during ground reaction force estimation, facilitating precise torque calculation from motion data alone. A generalization evaluation was performed in 28 sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic older adults on movement tasks that were not included in the training dataset, allowing assessment of the model’s ability to generalize to unseen activities. For each lower-limb joint, Peak Torque (PT), Rate of Torque Development (RTD), and Power Range (PR) were extracted and analyzed in relation to established clinical metrics of Sarcopenia. These torque-based parameters were also compared between Sarcopenic and healthy groups to identify joint-specific functional differences.
resultsThe proposed CoP limiter improved the accuracy of joint torque estimation without force plates by reducing center of pressure error by up to 49.3 percent and ground reaction force error by up to 6.5 percent on unseen data. Across various model configurations, the framework achieved RMSE values of 0.034 m for CoP, 0.752 N/kg for GRF, and 0.243 Nm/kg for GRM during testing. The computed torque metrics demonstrated strong correlations with conventional Sarcopenia indicators such as grip strength, gait speed, and chair-stand time. These correlations were both task- and joint-specific, allowing identification of localized muscle weaknesses and compensatory strategies. Significant differences in torque profiles were also observed between Sarcopenic and healthy individuals, particularly in tasks involving rapid force generation or postural control.
conclusionsThe proposed framework enables quantitative assessment of joint-specific functional muscle performance using only motion data, providing preliminary insight toward personalized intervention. Its passive and non-contact implementation supports unobtrusive, longitudinal monitoring, which is essential for capturing the slow and often subclinical progression of Sarcopenia and for informing timely clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.