ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Opioid prescribing practices in the U.S. and subsequent falls: a scoping review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFalls resulting from or related to opioid use are a major concern for morbidity and mortality in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States 2022 seeks to enhance the effectiveness and safety of pain treatment by improving function and quality of life for patients with pain while reducing opioid-related risks. The American College of Surgeons' Best Practices Guidelines in Geriatric Trauma Management and the 4 M's Framework of an Age-Friendly Health System both recommend incorporating fall prevention and safe mobility strategies into healthcare for older adults. In line with these guidelines and our review questions, this scoping review protocol aims to better understand the research on opioid prescribing practices and subsequent falls by identifying and mapping (1) the types of available evidence about opioid prescribing practices and subsequent falls and (2) the key characteristics of treatment and continuing care of falls with specific emphasis on opioid prescribing practices.
methodsElectronic database searches will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus to identify evidence published in the United States from January 1, 2016, onward. This scoping review will consider primary literature, observational, quasi-experimental, and experimental, implementation, and quality improvement studies, as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Eligible studies will focus on adults aged 18 years and older who have been prescribed opioids and subsequently experienced a fall. DISCUSSION: There is a gap in our understanding about opioid prescribing and subsequent falls. This scoping review will help fill this gap by mapping the recent available evidence-aligned with clinical guidelines about (1) prescribing practices and subsequent falls and (2) key characteristics of the treatment and continuing care of falls. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ID: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JP49Y . https://osf.io/jp49y .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.