ReviewStem cell research & therapy2026
Immune-evasive stem cells: engineering tolerance and reprogramming microenvironments for regenerative therapy.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellularized Skin Substitute Bioengineering for Regenerative Medicine: Cell Sources, Culture Strategies, and Transition Toward Defined, Xeno-Free Culture Systems.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Advancing fat graft survival: from adipose-derived stem cell mechanisms to next-generation regenerative strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Epigenetic regulation in transplant rejection and tolerance: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stem cell transplantation (SCT) holds significant promise for regenerative medicine, yet immune rejection remains a major obstacle. To address this, recent advances leverage CRISPR/Cas9 to engineer hypoimmunogenic induced pluripotent stem cells. These modified cells lack classical immune recognition markers (HLA class I/II) yet retain immune-tolerant molecules such as HLA-E, HLA-G, and CD47, enabling their universal use across different individuals. Additionally, mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes and immune checkpoint modulators (e.g., PD-L1) have shown clinical effectiveness by reducing graft-versus-host disease and autoimmune reactions. They achieve this through mechanisms such as suppressing inflammatory T-cell activation, promoting regulatory T-cell expansion, and modulating macrophage polarization. Despite these advances, several challenges remain. One key concern is the potential tumorigenic risk caused by genomic instability during genome editing and long-term cell expansion. Emerging precision editing platforms, including base editing and prime editing, provide strategies to reduce double-strand DNA break-induced chromosomal rearrangements and improve genomic safety. Future research priorities include integrating AI-based immune profiling, precision genome editing, and advanced 3D-bioprinting technologies. Together, these innovations represent a paradigm shift toward developing safer, more effective, universally compatible stem cell therapies for diseases previously deemed untreatable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.