ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2026
Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI) Supports Harmonized Somatic Variant Interpretation in Precision Oncology.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and reproducible interpretation of somatic variants is fundamental for therapy decision-making in patients with cancer. To harmonize and automate oncogenicity classification, Oncogenicity Variant Interpreter (OncoVI), an open-source, Python-based implementation of the Clinical Genome Resource/Cancer Genomics Consortium/Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium oncogenicity guidelines, was developed. For each of the guideline criteria, the textual descriptions were interpreted, and publicly available resources were identified to be used as reference. Starting from the genomic coordinates of a variant, OncoVI automatically performs functional annotation, collects relevant evidence from the integrated resources, evaluates each criterion, and provides a final oncogenicity classification. OncoVI achieved an accuracy of 80% on a gold standard set of 93 somatic variants provided by the guidelines, with a sensitivity of 88% for oncogenic/likely oncogenic variants. When applied to a real-world set of 7802 variants from 557 participants previously evaluated by the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) Erlangen, OncoVI showed 79% concordance with the prior MTB assessment of variant impact on protein function. In addition, expert reassessment of 135 MTB variants, conducted in accordance with the oncogenicity guidelines, further confirmed both the validity of OncoVI implementation and the appropriateness of the identified resources. Taken together, OncoVI provides significant support for the harmonized and reproducible oncogenicity classification of somatic variants across institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.