ReviewCurrent urology reports2026
Surgical Determinants of Outcomes in Partial Nephrectomy: a Contemporary Review.
Review in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sutureless versus renorrhaphy in robot-assisted off-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPartial nephrectomy has become the preferred treatment for localized renal masses, particularly in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) era. However, outcomes depend not only on the surgical approach but also on how each step of the procedure is performed. This review examines the key technical steps and clinical determinants that influence oncologic control, renal functional preservation, and perioperative morbidity in contemporary minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. RECENT
findingsRecent evidence highlights the importance of assessing tumor complexity, tailoring ischemia strategies, and selecting resection techniques that maximize parenchymal preservation. Advances in intraoperative imaging, three-dimensional planning, and fluorescence guidance have improved surgical precision and supported more informed intraoperative decision-making. Comparative studies also suggest that techniques such as tumor enucleation and selective clamping can help preserve renal function without compromising oncologic outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Current evidence suggests that outcomes after PN depend largely on tumor characteristics, patient factors, and the way the operation is performed, rather than on the surgical platform itself. Achieving optimal results requires careful preoperative planning, precise surgical technique, and adequate experience. Ongoing advances in imaging integration and intraoperative guidance technologies may further support surgical decision-making and help improve renal functional preservation in nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.