ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Practical management of hematuria after endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic obstruction.
Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative hematuria following transurethral prostate procedures ranges from self-limited bleeding to life-threatening hemorrhage. Clinically significant hematuria occurs in approximately 13-22% of patients after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with clot retention in 1-5%. Bleeding risk increases with prostate size, and transfusion rates approach 9% for glands exceeding 60 g. This perspective synthesizes current evidence on the prevention and management of postoperative hematuria across transurethral prostate procedures, including standard TURP, laser techniques, and office-based minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs). Prevention begins preoperatively with risk stratification, anticoagulation management, and consideration of 5α-reductase inhibitors to reduce prostatic vascularity. Intraoperatively, bipolar energy and laser vaporization provide improved hemostasis compared with monopolar resection, while MISTs such as UroLift and Rezūm carry distinct bleeding profiles that warrant tailored postoperative management. Postoperative management follows a stepwise approach: large-lumen catheterization with continuous bladder irrigation, balloon traction for tamponade, antispasmodics for bladder spasm control, and tranexamic acid for pharmacologic hemostasis. Surgical escalation with cystoscopic clot evacuation, fulguration, or prostatic artery embolization is reserved for refractory cases. We present a device-agnostic outpatient workflow (Figure 1) applicable to ambulatory and office-based procedures. Most patients recover with conservative measures, and protocolized care improves safety and outcomes. Future research should focus on standardizing management pathways, identifying predictors of clinically significant bleeding, and exploring the role of AI-based risk stratification and novel hemostatic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41936699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.