ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
A fully automated CT-based pelvimetry pipeline for quantifying mid-pelvic surgical workspace in rectal cancer.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePelvimetry may aid preoperative planning in rectal cancer surgery, yet manual measurements are time-consuming and MRI-based methods require dedicated protocols. We developed a fully automated CT-based pipeline for quantifying mid-pelvic geometry and soft tissue occupancy at the ischial spine level, the narrowest corridor encountered during total mesorectal excision.
methodsThis retrospective feasibility study included 73 patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer who underwent contrast-enhanced staging CT. Automated segmentation was performed using TotalSegmentator. The pipeline extracted interspinous distance (ISD) via an anatomically anchored search strategy with valley detection, constructed a posterior pelvic triangle bounded by the bilateral ischial spines and anterior sacrum, and quantified bowel and fat occupancy within this region. Automated measurements were validated against blinded manual annotations by two independent raters. Pipeline success rates, failure taxonomy, and agreement between contrast-enhanced and non-contrast acquisitions (n = 69 paired cases) were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.
resultsThe pipeline achieved complete ISD extraction in 100% of contrast-enhanced and 95.8% of non-contrast cases. In blinded validation (n = 70), automated ISD agreement against manual reference (ICC = 0.977; bias = 0.45 mm) exceeded inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.962), and triangle-derived metrics showed a good-to-excellent agreement (ICC = 0.86-0.89, auto vs. manual). ISD measurements showed excellent agreement across contrast conditions (ICC = 0.99; mean bias = 0.09 mm; 95% limits of agreement: - 2.51 to 2.69 mm). Bone-derived triangle metrics demonstrated strong concordance (ICC = 0.90-0.93). Fat-related metrics showed systematic differences between contrast conditions but maintained good agreement (ICC = 0.87-0.91). Sex-based differences were consistent with known pelvic dimorphism.
conclusionThis fully automated pipeline reliably extracts mid-pelvic geometry and soft tissue metrics from routine staging CT, with measurement agreement matching or exceeding manual inter-rater variability, offering a standardized, practical, and reproducible approach for characterizing the surgical workspace in rectal cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41936698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.