SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
User experiences of digital health interventions among older adults with cancer: a systematic review of qualitative data.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this review was to synthesize and analyze the results of several qualitative studies to understand the perceptions of older adults with cancer using digital health interventions to manage cancer in a digital context.
methodsSix databases were systematically queried to identify qualitative studies of digital health interventions in older cancer populations, published from the inception of the databases until December 10, 2024. Studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected, and the quality of the literature was assessed according to established guidelines. The results were synthesized using a thematic synthesis approach.
resultsA total of 12 papers were included. Three analytic themes emerged, (1) positive experiences, (2) barriers to use, (3) user expectations. The first theme was with three descriptive themes, including "improved self-management," "safe and accessible support," and "better access to health information"; the second theme with three descriptive themes, including "inadequate content design," "technical difficulties," and negative user perceptions and behaviors"; the third theme with two descriptive themes: "enhanced functionality" and "optimized user experience."
conclusionsThis study found that older adults with cancer recognize the benefits of digital health Interventions in improving their health. However, their experiences are influenced by various factors. Patients expressed diverse needs regarding the functionality, information support, and social support aspects of digital health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41936643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.