ArticleScientific reports2026
Digitalised phenotyping of pepper (Capsicum spp.) using effective RGB imaging and optimised camera positioning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent technological advancements employ imaging techniques to examine the morphological, physiological, and genetic differences among plant accessions, enhancing precision and productivity. High-throughput phenotyping serves as an essential method for selecting traits and reducing errors tied to manual data collection. However, the effects of camera-to-object distance in imaging acquisition for plant phenomics have received less attention. We analyzed the imaging parameters that define well the morphological characteristics of pepper and the effects of camera-to-object distance on the imaging of plant growth, leaf dimensions, fruit, and seed characteristics. Three camera-to-object distances (0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 m) were studied for the vegetative stage, and six camera-to-object distances (0.35-0.85 m) were used for the reproductive stages. The results demonstrated that imaging parameters such as Major (the longest line that can be drawn within the leaf) and Minor (the shortest line perpendicular to the major axis) are more effective for assessing canopy spread, while imaging Height provides a strong correlation (r = 0.9) for actual plant height measurement. An optimal camera-to-object distance of 0.8 m yielded better correlations for vegetative traits across all pepper genotypes, likely due to resolution factors at different growth stages. For fruit and seed traits, shorter distances of 0.55 m and 0.65 m were suitable. Additionally, the weights of fresh and dry fruit correlated highly with image area (r = 0.94 and 0.89, respectively, at 0.55 m). The studied pepper genotypes exhibited distinct seed characteristics, including variations in Roundness, Solidity, and Circularity. The imaging approach can accurately capture various plant characteristics and has the potential to replace traditional methods for assessing plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.