ArticleScientific reports2026
Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and risk factors in hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the post-ibrutinib era.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has improved outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma, yet prognosis remains inadequate for many. The choice between high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and allogeneic HCT remains a topic of debate in this patient population. This Japanese retrospective study (2017–2023) analyzed 155 patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma receiving autologous (n = 105) or allogeneic HCT (n = 50). Autologous and allogeneic HCT showed comparable efficacy, with similar median OS (28 vs. 27 months). However, outcome predictors differed significantly. Autologous HCT: age > 60 years predicted worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.73) and allogeneic HCT: early progression surrogate based on diagnosis-to-HCT interval ≤ 24 months and relapsed or refractory status at HCT (HR = 4.10) and non-complete remission (HR = 3.53) correlated with poorer outcomes. Ibrutinib integration demonstrated critical benefits: post-autologous relapse patients receiving ibrutinib had superior 2-year OS (57% vs. 25%, P = 0.035), and no transplant-related mortality occurred in allogeneic HCT patients on ibrutinib (n = 10). This study confirms HCT use in the ibrutinib era, highlighting age, disease kinetics, and targeted therapy as key prognostic factors, and supports risk-adapted strategies combining HCT with novel agents like ibrutinib to optimize outcomes for high-risk mantle cell lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.