Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41936607›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A unified multimodal GenAI platform integrating GraphRAG multi-agent systems and custom language models for intelligent document processing and knowledge synthesis.

Bharat Singh Parihar, Tarun Kumar Singh, Govind Gonnade, Bhupesh Kumar Dewangan, Nilesh Shelke, Amit Pimpalkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bharat Singh PariharSymbiosis Institute of Technology Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Tarun Kumar SinghSymbiosis Institute of Technology Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Govind GonnadeSymbiosis Institute of Technology Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Bhupesh Kumar DewanganSymbiosis Institute of Technology Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. bhupesh.dewangan@gmail.com.
Nilesh ShelkeSymbiosis Institute of Technology Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. nilesh.shelke@sitnagpur.siu.edu.in.
Amit PimpalkarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Ramdeobaba University, Nagpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) based enterprise systems on document reasoning tasks are getting to grow more based on Large Language Models (LLMs); however, non-vector-based RAG pipelines continue to show inadequate relational consistency, multi-document aggregation, and task-specific decision support. This work presents a unified Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) platform that integrates a multi-agent system with Graph-based RAG (GraphRAG) to support complex, multi-task reasoning over structured and unstructured data. The framework combines knowledge graph construction, dense retrieval, and a custom language model to enable accurate and context-aware responses across tasks such as document question answering, entity extraction, text-to-SQL generation, and fact verification. A modular pipeline is designed for task classification, agent routing, retrieval-oriented reasoning, and task-specific execution, including ATS resume evaluation. The suggested platform consists of 5 conceptual layers and may be applied to solve multi-PDF questions and analyze resumes in an automated Applicant Tracking System (ATS). The platform has a set of six custom-trained LLMs, the largest of which is a 175-billion-parameter foundation model that trained on 2.5 trillion tokens, is more domain flexible and less reliant on external API-based solutions. Experimental analysis of document question answering depicts that GraphRAG performs better by 23% and 46% in exact-match accuracy and multi-hop reasoning accuracy in comparison to baselines with only a slight augment in mean latency of 45 ms. The accuracy on complex queries of a schema-aware T2S model containing safety checks at execution of 94.2% is significantly greater compared to direct prompting on Trustworthy Language Model (TLM). The multi-agent model achieves 96.8% correspondence with professional recruiter guesses on 500 resumes and mean error of absolute lesser than that of uni-agent benchmarks. The independent research assistant saves approximately 65% time utilized in manual research and the level of accuracy is 98%.

Indexed as

Document intelligenceGraph retrieval-augmented generationKnowledge graphsLarge language modelsMicroservices architectureMulti-agent systemsNatural language processingSemantic searchT2STransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41936607
PMCPMC13216342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.