ArticleScientific reports2026
In silico analysis of patient specific coagulation and flow effects on fibrin clot formation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The coagulation cascade, triggered by tissue factor (TF) exposure after endothelial injury, drives fibrin formation and may result in thrombotic events such as stroke. The mechanisms driving differences in thrombus extent among patients remain poorly understood, but interactions between patient-specific coagulation and local blood flow are thought to be critical. This study presents a unified workflow with an assay-calibrated, experimentally validated in silico model that links coagulation assays to flow-resolved simulations in patient-specific geometries. Plasma from ischemic stroke patients was analyzed with a thrombin generation (TG) assay, and a 0D computational model was fitted to TG curves to infer patient-specific coagulation parameters. These parameters were validated against thrombodynamics (TD) outcomes using 1D computational reaction-diffusion simulations. The framework was extended to 2D computational flow domains to assess the influence of shear rate, TF patch size and location, and geometric features such as stenosis. Finally, 3D carotid simulations combined patient-specific vascular geometries with plasma parameters. The 0D model reproduced TG data, while 1D simulations matched TD outcomes for clot size, fibrin growth, and thrombin wave speed. In 2D, fibrin formation was reduced at higher shear or smaller TF patches, and 3D simulations demonstrated the combined effect of flow, geometry, and plasma composition on fibrin formation. This approach provides a bridge from bench assays to hemodynamic contexts and offers a potential path toward individualized thrombotic risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.