Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41936601›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Proximity structures on hesitant fuzzy sets and Its application.

Pankaj, Rashmi Singh, Repalle V N Srinivas Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

PankajDepartment of Mathematics, Amity Institute of Applied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, 201313, India.
Rashmi SinghDepartment of Mathematics, Amity Institute of Applied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, 201313, India. rsingh7@amity.edu.
Repalle V N Srinivas RaoDepartment of Mathematics, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia. rvnrepalle@wollegauniversity.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present article discusses the extension of classical proximity theory to multi valued systems. Existing distance measures for hesitant fuzzy sets operate primarily at the computational level without establishing the rigorous mathematical foundations. This paper develops a comprehensive axiomatic framework for proximity spaces on hesitant fuzzy sets. First, five fundamental axioms (HFP0–HFP5) for hesitant fuzzy proximity relations are introduced, generalizing classical proximity theory to fit multi-valued membership structures. Second, it is proven that hesitant fuzzy proximity spaces induce completely regular topologies, and the Smirnov compactification theorem is established for these spaces. Third, a bijective correspondence between hesitant fuzzy proximities and totally bounded uniformities is demonstrated, along with a metrization theorem characterizing when compatible metrics exist. Fourth, a new concept of variable length proximity measure is proposed that naturally handles hesitant fuzzy elements of different cardinalities without requiring artificial data extension or reduction. Finally, the practical applicability of the framework is validated through a facial recognition case study, where the proposed discrete hesitant fuzzy proximity successfully identifies images of the same individual under varying lighting and rotation conditions while correctly discriminating different subjects. This work bridges classical proximity theory and modern uncertainty modeling, giving both theoretical foundations and applicability for decision-making under hesitancy.

Indexed as

Axiomatic structureDistance measuresHesitant fuzzy setsPattern recognitionProximity spacesTopology

Identifiers

PMID41936601
PMCPMC13212731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.