ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of natural FGFR3 inhibitor for glioma using integrated computational and microRNA regulatory analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated experimental and computational evaluation of atractylenolide III from Tubipora musica for anticancer lead identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- 3D CNN-CVAE and LSTM-guided de novo design of rotigotine derivatives targeting dopamine D1 and D3 receptors in restless legs syndrome.PloS one · 2026Article
- Integrated computational and experimental evaluation of natural products targeting PGM/AlgC and HisIE in multidrug-resistant respiratory pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is an aggressive and treatment-resistant brain tumor with poor prognosis, frequently driven by aberrant activation of receptor tyrosine kinases such as fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). Genetic alterations including FGFR3–TACC3 fusions and post-transcriptional deregulation mediated by tumor-suppressive microRNAs (miR-99a and miR-100) contribute to sustained FGFR3 signaling, glioma progression, and therapeutic resistance. In this study, a structure-based computational pipeline was employed to identify natural inhibitors targeting FGFR3. A phytochemical library comprising 25 plant-derived compounds was screened using ADME criteria, resulting in seven candidates with favorable gastrointestinal absorption and drug-likeness. Among them, Guggulsterone emerged as the top-ranked compound, exhibiting the highest docking affinity (− 10.1 kcal/mol) toward the FGFR3 kinase domain and forming stable hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions with key active-site residues. The FGFR3 structure used showed high stereochemical quality (ERRAT score: 96.5; 93% residues in favored Ramachandran regions). Molecular dynamics simulations (500 ns) demonstrated stable complex formation, with RMSD convergence after 40 ns, low RMSF values, and consistent radius of gyration (1.96–2.04 nm). Persistent intermolecular hydrogen bonds (two to four) and stable solvent accessibility were observed throughout the simulation. MMGBSA binding free energy calculations predicted a favorable interaction (ΔGtotal = − 30.44 kcal/mol), primarily driven by van der Waals and electrostatic contributions. Pharmacophore analysis revealed two hydrogen bond acceptors and seven hydrophobic features, while density functional theory calculations indicated moderate chemical reactivity (HOMO–LUMO gap: 0.1797 a.u.). Toxicity assessment using ProTox 3.0 classified Guggulsterone as low-toxic (LD50 = 2300 mg/kg, Class 5). Collectively, these in-silico findings suggest Guggulsterone as a promising natural FGFR3-binding scaffold warranting further experimental validation in FGFR3-driven glioma models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.