Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41936597›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Measuring the psychological restorative quality of urban spaces: a vision language model-based method.

Haoran Ma, Mei-Po Kwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haoran MaInstitute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Fok Ying Tung Remote Sensing Science Building, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5550-4076
Mei-Po KwanInstitute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Fok Ying Tung Remote Sensing Science Building, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China. mpkwan@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8602-9258

Funding

University Grants Committee 14605920, 14606922, 14603724, C4023-20GF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-designed urban environments crucially mitigate stress and enhance mental well-being through their restorative qualities. However, subjective surveys lack spatial scalability, while objective machine learning often fails to capture the complexity of human perceptual experiences. To address this gap, this study proposes a hybrid framework based on Vision Language Models (VLMs) and human experiences to assess the restorative quality of urban spaces. Using Shenzhen, China as a case study, we gathered subjective and objective knowledge from PRS-11 surveys and ChatGPT-4 descriptions of 566 street view images, incorporating this into VLM prompts via the Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) model. Through prompt engineering, the VLM evaluated 2,224 additional images, with semantic networks analyzing the decision-making process. Results demonstrate that: (1) our method significantly outperformed Random Forest, with an R² increase of 0.535 attributed to prior knowledge fusion; (2) restorative quality exhibits spatial heterogeneity, clustering in developed districts near park and coastal zones; and (3) semantic network analysis further revealed the decision rationales of VLMs across different restorative dimensions, providing design guidelines for low restorative quality spaces. This research offers a novel methodology for assessing restorative quality of urban spaces, providing practical tools for sustainable development and human mental well-being.

Indexed as

ChinaHumansLarge Language ModelsPsychological Well-BeingAttention Restoration TheoryRestorative qualityStreet view imagesUrban spacesVisual language model

Identifiers

PMID41936597
PMCPMC13216355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.