ArticleScientific reports2026
Measuring the psychological restorative quality of urban spaces: a vision language model-based method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond beneficial or ineffective: three-way decision modeling of image-level affective responses to restorative environment design.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Well-designed urban environments crucially mitigate stress and enhance mental well-being through their restorative qualities. However, subjective surveys lack spatial scalability, while objective machine learning often fails to capture the complexity of human perceptual experiences. To address this gap, this study proposes a hybrid framework based on Vision Language Models (VLMs) and human experiences to assess the restorative quality of urban spaces. Using Shenzhen, China as a case study, we gathered subjective and objective knowledge from PRS-11 surveys and ChatGPT-4 descriptions of 566 street view images, incorporating this into VLM prompts via the Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) model. Through prompt engineering, the VLM evaluated 2,224 additional images, with semantic networks analyzing the decision-making process. Results demonstrate that: (1) our method significantly outperformed Random Forest, with an R² increase of 0.535 attributed to prior knowledge fusion; (2) restorative quality exhibits spatial heterogeneity, clustering in developed districts near park and coastal zones; and (3) semantic network analysis further revealed the decision rationales of VLMs across different restorative dimensions, providing design guidelines for low restorative quality spaces. This research offers a novel methodology for assessing restorative quality of urban spaces, providing practical tools for sustainable development and human mental well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.