Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41936128›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2026

Oral mucosa graft ureteroplasty: defining its role in complex ureteral reconstruction.

Mattia Lo Re, Bruno Bucca, Andrea Cocci, Trauma, Reconstructive Urology Working Party of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mattia Lo ReDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Bruno BuccaDepartment of Urology "U. Bracci", Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Andrea CocciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Trauma, Reconstructive Urology Working Party of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOral mucosa graft ureteroplasty has emerged as an organ-sparing option for complex ureteral strictures, potentially avoiding bowel interposition or renal autotransplantation in selected patients. This review is timely because indications, technical variants, and outcome definitions remain heterogeneous, and contemporary series are expanding the evidence base. RECENT

findingsAcross predominantly retrospective cohorts, oral mucosa grafting is most frequently applied to proximal and mid-ureteral strictures of several centimetres, including redo and post-endoscopic etiologies. Reported success is high when a well-vascularized bed is ensured and postoperative surveillance is standardized. Technical themes include onlay versus augmented anastomotic repairs, the selective use of vascularized coverage (omental or retroperitoneal/perinephric fat), and growing attention to donor-site morbidity, which is generally low but inconsistently reported. SUMMARY: Oral mucosa graft ureteroplasty should be considered within the reconstructive ladder for carefully selected complex strictures where primary anastomosis or reimplantation is not feasible, and where more morbid substitutes can be deferred. Future priorities include standardized definitions of success, comparative studies against ileal ureter and autotransplantation, and long-term renal functional outcomes with patient-reported measures.

Indexed as

Mouth MucosaPlastic Surgery ProceduresUreterUreteral ObstructionUrologic Surgical ProceduresConstriction, PathologicHumansTreatment Outcomebuccal mucosaoral mucosaureteral obstructionureteral strictureureteroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41936128
PMCPMC13258110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.