ArticleNursing open2026
Knowledge and Practice of Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Burn Management: A Survey of Nursing and Midwifery Students.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the nursing and midwifery students' knowledge and practice regarding fluid resuscitation during the acute phase of burn management.
designA cross-sectional, descriptive design was employed.
methodsThe data were collected using an online-administered questionnaire at a governmental university among nursing and midwifery students, who were selected purposively. The instrument consisted of three sections. The first section covered participants' characteristics, including age, sex, marital status, academic program, level of study, grade point average (GPA) and residency. The second section is self-reported and composed of 10 questions to assess the students' knowledge domains, and the third section is also self-reported and composed of 11 questions to assess participants' practice regarding practice; each question received a binary response based on whether or not students completed a specific practice.
resultsThe study of midwifery and nursing students reported that they had an average knowledge (73.58%) of fluid monitoring, with 96% comprehending fluid balance, but only 28.4% being able to calculate fluids using the Parkland formula. In practice, participants demonstrated a high level of compliance (94.89%) with documentation of fluid administration; however, adherence was notably lower (85.7%) for the application of the rule of nines during assessment. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Midwives and nurses draw clinical judgements based on their academic and professional experience, as well as scientific facts. Theoretical knowledge can help support and improve health practices. A strong intellectual background is essential for providing appropriate care throughout the acute phase of burn management. Future research could incorporate direct observation methods to validate self-reported findings and assess the translation of theoretical knowledge into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.