ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026
Evaluation of structured and seed-blend refuges for corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using emergence cages and screen-bagged ear methods.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), is a major lepidopteran pest of corn (Zea mays L.) in the United States and is widely managed using transgenic corn hybrids expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) (Bt) proteins. Seed-blend refuges, in which Bt and non-Bt seeds are mixed in fixed proportions, have been widely adopted as a convenient insect resistance management (IRM) strategy. However, concerns remain about their efficiency in producing susceptible moths compared to a structured block refuge. To evaluate this, five field experiments were conducted across Texas and Georgia during 2020 to 2021 to compare adult H. zea emergence from non-Bt refuges configured as structured 100% non-Bt blocks or as 80:20 Bt/non-Bt seed blends. Adult production was quantified using two approaches: emergence cages that captured pupal-to-adult survival and screen bags that confined larvae on individual ears. Both methods yielded comparable estimates of adult H. zea emergence. Across all locations and years, seed-blend plots consistently produced fewer moths than expected based on the 20% refuge proportion, yielding 61% to 91% of the adults produced from structured refuges. Screen bag assays similarly showed reduced larval and pupal recovery from seed-blend ears. Non-Bt ears from seed-blend plots did not consistently differ from structured refuges in larval feeding intensity. Findings from this study indicate that seed-blend refuges may underperform in producing susceptible moths and may not consistently function as an effective standalone refuge strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.