ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Immunohistochemical assessment of vimentin expression and Ki-67 proliferation index in conventional urothelial carcinoma: a study of 60 Egyptian patients.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy with a substantial burden, including in Egypt. Although Ki-67 and EMT-related markers such as vimentin have been previously studied, region-specific validation and practical cutoff performance remain relevant.Author names: Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, middle name/initial, family name). Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct. We have made the requested corrections. In addition, we would like to change the author order so that Deema Abu Al-Teen is listed as author number 4, and Abdulhadi Samman is moved to author number 8 in her place, with the same affiliation as currently shown related to each author, Samman (Jeddah) and Abu Al-Teen (Amman).
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 60 archival conventional UC cases diagnosed at university hospitals during 2024. Tumors were re-reviewed to confirm grade and stage and categorized as NMIBC or MIBC. Immunohistochemistry was performed for vimentin and Ki-67 (MIB-1). Vimentin was considered positive when ≥ 10% of tumor cells showed convincing cytoplasmic staining. The Ki-67 labeling index was assessed in hotspots by counting ≥ 500 tumor nuclei and categorized as low (< 30%) versus high (≥ 30%) using a predefined pragmatic cutoff. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of high-grade disease.
resultsVimentin positivity was detected in 18/60 cases (30.0%), and high Ki-67 index was present in 37/60 (61.7%). High Ki-67 independently predicted high-grade carcinoma (OR = 5.601, p = 0.009) and was significantly associated with high grade (p = 0.011), non-papillary pattern (p < 0.001), and muscle invasion (p = 0.001), but not lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.405). Vimentin showed no significant associations and was not an independent predictor; Ki-67 and vimentin were not significantly correlated.
conclusionIn this Egyptian cohort, Ki-67 ≥ 30% was strongly associated with adverse pathological features and independently predicted high-grade disease, supporting its use as a practical ancillary marker and providing regional validation of prior reports. Vimentin was not significantly associated with the studied parameters in this dataset. Future studies should assess alternative cutoffs within the same cohort and validate outcome-linked thresholds in longitudinal datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41936003What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.