ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Network analysis of patient-reported complaints in climacteric syndrome: a single-center study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study analyzed medical records of patients with climacteric syndrome at a Korean medicine hospital and investigated the interrelationships among their symptoms using network analysis.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on 81 women (aged 45-60 years) who visited a women's health clinic between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021. Network analysis was performed on unstructured text from first-visit medical records to identify symptom patterns and compute centrality indices.
resultsThe most common symptoms were 'pain', 'hot flush', 'facial blushing', 'fatigue', and 'sleep disorder'. Among them, pain and hot flush showed high node strength, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality, which indicated their central role in symptom co-occurrence. Although there were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of symptoms between the premenopausal and postmenopausal groups, variations in symptom centrality and modular analysis results before and after menopause were noted, emphasizing the importance of detailed symptom analysis in clinical settings.
conclusionsBy analyzing medical records of patients with climacteric syndrome, this study clarified symptom patterns in menopausal women, providing data for targeted and stage-specific treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.