Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41935986›Full record

ReviewCarbon balance and management2026

Research progress on the interaction between forest carbon sequestration and climate change.

Jiaxin Lin, Xiang Gao, Xiaojiao Song, Shuhang Chang, Qiuran Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiaxin LinCollege of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Xiang GaoCollege of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China. xgao@lzu.edu.cn.
Xiaojiao SongCollege of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Shuhang ChangCollege of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Qiuran LiCollege of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program(CN) 2019YFC0507402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global climate change represents one of the most critical environmental challenges of the twenty-first century. As a key component of the terrestrial carbon cycle, forest ecosystems play a pivotal role in mitigating global warming. This paper provides a systematic review of the dynamic measurement methods for forest carbon sequestration, examines the interaction mechanisms between forest carbon sequestration and climate change, and studies the feedback mechanism of forest carbon sinks on climate change and regional differences. Results reveal that climate change influences forest carbon sequestration through various pathways, including rising temperatures, shifts in precipitation patterns, elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and extreme climatic events. Simultaneously, forest carbon sequestration exerts a significant regulatory impact on the climate system. Future research should endeavour in the following areas: (1) Developing a consistent assessment system for forest carbon sequestration; (2) Quantifying multi-factor interactions; (3) Compound extreme climate events; (4) Make up for the observation shortcomings in key areas. This paper aims to provide references and guidelines for a systematic understanding of forest carbon sequestration and climate change interactions, as well as to promote scientific and technological developments in this field.

Indexed as

Carbon cycleCarbon sequestration assessmentClimate changeClimate feedbackForest carbon sequestrationRegional heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID41935986
PMCPMC13255328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.