ReviewVeterinary research communications2026
Diagnostic approach, vaccination and treatment priorities for Lumpy Skin Disease in cattle: lessons from Balkan epidemics to Western Europe re-emergence (2025).
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumpy skin disease (LSD) remains a high-impact, transboundary infection of cattle driven by capripoxvirus transmission via mechanical vectors, causing morbidity, production losses, and trade disruption. Following the 2015–2017 Balkan epidemics, coordinated high-coverage vaccination campaigns and movement restrictions substantially reduced disease transmission across southeastern Europe. However, the recent re-emergence of LSD in Western Europe in 2025, including outbreaks reported in Italy, France, and Spain, demonstrates that regional elimination remains fragile and requires sustained preparation. This review evaluates the evidence across three practical pillars of outbreak management: diagnostic approach, vaccination strategies, and clinical/therapeutic care. Particular emphasis is placed on vaccination strategies used in field control programs, including mass vaccination, targeted and emergency (ring) vaccination, as well as the comparative performance of homologous live-attenuated Neethling vaccines and heterologous sheep and goatpox vaccines. Emerging inactivated and DIVA-compatible vaccine approaches are also discussed, together with field-level determinants of vaccine effectiveness, such as vaccination coverage, campaign timing, booster policies, cold-chain integrity, and the monitoring of adverse reactions. Based on lessons learned from European epidemics, we propose a phase-based decision-making framework that integrates rapid diagnosis, emergency vaccination, surveillance, and vector management to reduce morbidity and limit onward transmission. Because no licensed LSDV-specific antiviral therapy is currently available, treatment remains primarily supportive. It includes early detection and isolation, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic therapy, hydration and nutritional support, wound and mastitis management, and judicious antimicrobial use for secondary bacterial infections. In addition, we review emerging experimental evidence suggesting that several herbal, conventional, and antiparasitic compounds may represent promising candidates for future therapeutic approaches against LSD. Moreover, the further spread of LSD in Russia and the Middle East has been suggested to be associated with disruptions in vaccine attenuation processes, together with operational constraints affecting compliance and policy implementation in 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.