Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41935957›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Clinical Effectiveness of Monofilament Fibre Pads for Bacterial and Biofilm Removal in Pressure Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Chihiro Takizawa, Qi Qin, Daijiro Haba, Mari Abe, Sanae Sasaki, Akiko Kawasaki, Tomomi Miyake, Shunsuke Miura, Aya Kitamura, Hiromi Sanada and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chihiro TakizawaDepartment of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, tThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-5107
Qi QinDepartment of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, tThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-3523
Daijiro HabaGlobal Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8820-0952
Mari AbeDepartment of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, tThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-3637
Sanae SasakiDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko KawasakiDepartment of Nursing, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomomi MiyakeDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke MiuraDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Aya KitamuraDepartment of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, tThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1484-5261
Hiromi SanadaIshikawa Prefectural Nursing University, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1912-1251
Gojiro NakagamiDepartment of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, tThe University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-2464

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H04010Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H00547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monofilament fibre pads may offer an effective, less invasive method for managing biofilms in pressure injuries, but their clinical effectiveness in reducing bacteria and biofilms has not been fully evaluated. Although biofilm removal is recommended for wound management, less invasive methods applicable to daily care remain limited. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of monofilament fibre pads compared to gauze in reducing bacterial counts and biofilm burden in pressure injuries. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a Japanese university hospital. Bacterial counts were measured before and after cleansing using a rapid bacterial quantification system, and biofilm reduction rates were calculated using a wound blotting technique that enables non-invasive and quantitative evaluation of biofilms across the entire wound bed. Linear mixed-effects models were applied to evaluate the association between cleansing materials and outcomes, adjusting for baseline bacterial counts or biofilm brightness and the DESIGN-R2020 total score. Thirty-four pressure injuries in 30 patients were analysed, with 27 wound cleansing procedures performed using gauze and 73 using fibre pads. Fibre pad use significantly reduced bacterial counts (β = 0.389, p = 0.011) and biofilm burden (β = 0.642, p = 0.003) compared with gauze. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that these associations were robust, particularly after adjusting for baseline bacterial counts and biofilm brightness. These findings demonstrate that monofilament fibre pads are effective in reducing bacterial counts and biofilm burden in pressure injuries. Their routine use may provide a practical and less invasive adjunct for routine wound cleansing or maintenance biofilm control by facilitating bacterial and biofilm reduction.

Indexed as

BandagesBiofilmsPressure UlcerWound InfectionAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial LoadFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWound Healingbiofilmdebridementfibre padsubclinical infectionwound cleansing

Identifiers

PMID41935957
PMCPMC13050486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.