ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Ketamine or Esketamine in Special Populations of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional antidepressant drugs are effective in only approximately 50% of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Ketamine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, offers a promising alternative with an exceptionally rapid antidepressant effect. Although its efficacy in the general TRD population is well established, its use in specific patient subpopulations warrants further investigation. We conducted a comprehensive, non-systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence regarding ketamine and esketamine in patients with TRD and various comorbidities. We also discuss the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and neurobiological mechanisms underlying ketamine's antidepressant effects. Both ketamine and esketamine demonstrated efficacy in multiple TRD subpopulations, including geriatric, psychiatric, neurologic, oncologic, pediatric, and obstetric patients. Key challenges include management of psychotomimetic effects, potential for substance abuse, and cardiovascular adverse effects. Preliminary data concerning arketamine (R-ketamine) suggest potential advantages, such as longer-lasting antidepressant effects with fewer psychomotor adverse effects and lower abuse potential, opening avenues for future research. In conclusion, esketamine and ketamine show promise as effective and relatively safe treatments for selected sensitive subgroups of patients with TRD, provided that appropriate monitoring is implemented. Although preliminary results in patients with multiple comorbidities are encouraging, these findings are often derived from very small samples, underscoring the urgent need for larger, well-designed clinical trials to establish definitive efficacy and safety profiles across diverse populations. Further arketamine-focused research remains essential to fully define its therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.