ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Arch-First Technique for Extensive Thoracic Aortic Replacement: A Case Series of Patients With Complex Thoracic Aortic Disease.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given its associations with high morbidity and mortality, type A aortic dissection requires urgent surgical intervention. Patients with Marfan syndrome present additional complexity due to underlying connective tissue abnormalities that warrant multiple thoracic aortic operations. The "arch-first" technique was developed to allow single-stage open extensive replacement of the thoracic aorta while maintaining continuous antegrade cerebral perfusion, thereby minimizing brain ischemia. In the current endovascular era, the frozen elephant trunk - a hybrid technique combining a conventional surgical graft for arch reconstruction with an integrated distal stent-graft - has gained popularity in management of these cases, displacing extensive open approaches. However, for specific patient populations, the arch-first technique remains a suitable approach. CASE REPORT This report describes 6 patients (5 men, 1 woman; aged 24-73 years) who were treated between June 2022 and June 2025 through application of the arch-first technique in complex clinical scenarios, highlighting its benefit in providing effective single-stage management of extensive thoracic aortic pathology. Although no patient experienced neurological deficits, 50% (3/6) required prolonged mechanical ventilation due to the invasiveness of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS The arch-first technique represents an effective surgical strategy for single-stage extensive thoracic aortic replacement, offering reliable cerebral protection and reduced neurological risk in complex aortic disease cases, particularly those involving patients with Marfan syndrome and in reoperation settings. Despite its invasive nature and potential for pulmonary morbidity, the arch-first technique remains a valuable option for selected patients. Further multicenter studies are needed to compare its outcomes with frozen elephant trunk and hybrid approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.